Setting a multiyear vision for design

Turning design from “make it pretty” into a strategic lever for conversion, trust, and scale that led to a 10x conversion rate.

Setting a multiyear vision for design

Turning design from “make it pretty” into a strategic lever for conversion, trust, and scale that led to a 10x conversion rate.

Setting a multiyear vision for design

Turning design from “make it pretty” into a strategic lever for conversion, trust, and scale that led to a 10x conversion rate.

Setting a multiyear vision for design

Turning design from “make it pretty” into a strategic lever for conversion, trust, and scale that led to a 10x conversion rate.

TL;DR

We didn’t ‘feature’ our way to growth. We fixed trust + usability first, built a brand people believed, then earned the right to build smarter guidance.

Baseline

2.5%

paid conversion rate

Baseline

2.5%

paid conversion rate

Baseline

2.5%

paid conversion rate

Baseline

2.5%

paid conversion rate

Outcome

25%

paid conversion rate

Outcome

25%

paid conversion rate

Outcome

25%

paid conversion rate

Outcome

25%

paid conversion rate

Background

When I joined NewRetirement (now Boldin), the company had been operating for ~8 years with no dedicated design or product function. They’d built a real business—financial planning software funded by a reverse-mortgage leads operation—and had just closed their Seed round, which funded their first Head of Design (me) and Head of Product.

Starting point

Conversion was low, design debt was high

The projection engine was powerful, but the experience wasn’t built for usability or trust.

  • 100k+ registrations, only ~2.5% conversion to paid

  • Mobile effectively unsupported

  • Brand and UI felt stuck in 2008

  • High friction in the moments users needed clarity and confidence

  • Leadership wanted big bets (AI), but foundation couldn’t support more complexity

The challenge

The team was excited to have design, but didn’t yet know how to work with it or how it drives outcomes. Meanwhile, our founder had ambitious ideas for where design could go next—up to and including an AI coach. With a team of one, I needed to show a path from “design debt” to “design as a business lever,” without spreading design across a hundred disconnected initiatives.

The inflection point

Three months in (Nov 2020), the founder asked every department head to create a 2021 roadmap. I didn’t want design publishing something that conflicted with product—we were aligned and working toward the same outcomes—and I didn’t want foundational work to get cut because it wasn’t flashy.

Leadership wanted to move fast toward big bets like AI. But the product foundation wasn’t stable enough to support more complexity. The CTO, Head of Product, and I aligned we needed to improve fundamentals first—usability, consistency, and trust—then earn the right to pursue larger “intelligence” bets.

The framework

Three building blocks that ladder to business outcomes

I structured the vision into three building blocks. Each one had:

  • A clear definition

  • The business benefit it unlocks

  • Example initiatives (so it didn’t feel like a philosophy lecture)

Original Board

Original Board

Original Board

Original Board

1

Foundation

Goal

Establish a flexible, modular, scalable product design framework to reduce drop-off and increase velocity.

Why it mattered

We couldn’t “feature” our way out of design debt. Without consistency and usable patterns, every new feature would compound the mess—more support burden, more confusion, more drop-off.

Benefits unlocked

  • Consistency

  • Enhanced usability

  • Better velocity

  • Increased engagement

  • Ability to do smaller projects with maximum impact

  • Targeted experimentation

Example work

2

Emotion

Goal

Create a brand that propels us into the future and increases willingness to pay.

Why it mattered

Our product required trust. People don’t hand you their retirement life story if the experience feels like a 2008 spreadsheet simulator. We needed credibility, cohesion, and a brand that could scale beyond the founders.

Benefits unlocked

  • Consistency + recognizable personality

  • Unified messaging

  • Improved NPS

  • Increased willingness to pay

  • Increased acquisition

Example work

3

Intelligence

Goal

Amplify and enhance context, content, and exploration to increase clarity and guidance.

Why it mattered

This was the founder’s dream zone—AI coach, guidance, more “magic.” The framework didn’t shut that down. It sequenced it: we earn the right to build Intelligence by fixing Foundation and Emotion first.

Benefits unlocked

  • Improved conversion

  • Greater clarity

  • Credibility & trust

  • Broader user base

Example work

  • Cohort-based flows (guide people differently based on their situation)

  • Visualization overhaul

  • “To-do” and guided next steps

  • Templates / explainers

  • Explorers / optimizers paths

  • AI coach (positioned as a future layer, not step one)

How I got buy-in (without making it feel like “design said so”)

This wasn’t a deck I tossed over the fence. I used it as a shared alignment tool with the CEO, CTO, and Head of Product.

What made it work:

  • It was paired with concrete projects leadership already wanted (so it felt real).

  • It translated design work into outcomes (conversion, trust, velocity), not aesthetics.

  • It gave the founder a “yes, and…”: yes to AI/coach dreams—after we stabilize the product experience.

The result was a shift in the conversation from:

The resourcing plan:

Tying the vision to hiring

A multi-year vision is useless if it assumes infinite capacity. I paired the framework with a scaling & hiring plan that explained the tradeoff curve:

  • Too many designers too early → design gets far ahead of engineering and creates a painful gap.

  • Too few designers → design becomes a bottleneck and can’t show up where it needs to.

  • The target: design running ~1 month ahead of dev (and a quarter ahead for larger projects).

Then I mapped what “good” looks like at different team sizes:

2020–2021

Set the foundation (1 designer)

Theme: Prove and operationalize the value of design.

What it will feel like

  • Less formal process

  • “Squeaky wheel gets the oil” prioritization

  • Competing priorities without great evidence

  • Balancing product + everything else (marketing, decks, B2B needs)

What we'll accomplish

  • Completed brand work

  • Overhauled “My Plan”

  • Overhauled dashboard + FTUE

  • Overhauled onboarding

  • Started a design system

  • Proved the value of design

2022

Incremental expansion (2–4 designers)

Theme: Learn how flexible the design org needs to be.

What it will feel like

  • More formal processes

  • Ability to do more without constant triage

  • More thoughtful prioritization decisions

  • Time for some non-essential/delight work (without sacrificing fundamentals)

What we'll accomplish

  • Narrow the brand into richer craft (motion, illustration, photography)

  • Widgets & experiences

  • KPI-driven projects

  • New marketing site

  • White label needs

  • IA improvements

  • Complete application of brand

  • Journey, coach, plan reports

2023+ (post series B or large B2B deal)

Larger specialized expansion (5–10 designers)

Theme: Learn how flexible the design org needs to be.

What it will feel like

  • “It’s all coming together”

  • Each business area has dedicated design support

  • The team can go deeper on craft and storytelling (illustration, content, video, etc.)

What we'll accomplish

  • So much! The future is bright 🔮

What changed because of this work

This framework did four critical things for the business:

It created shared language for prioritization

We could finally discuss tradeoffs as “Foundation vs. Emotion vs. Intelligence,” not “who yelled loudest this week.”

It protected foundational work

By explicitly tying Foundation to speed, experimentation, and conversion, it was harder to dismiss as “polish.”

It set the conditions for scaling

The hiring plan wasn’t “we need more designers.” It was:

  • what we can realistically deliver at each stage

  • what investment unlocks next

  • when specialization actually makes sense

It turned design into a conversion engine

Because we protected Foundation work and sequenced brand + guidance, we moved subscription conversion from 2.5% to 25% over time.

It created shared language for prioritization

We could finally discuss tradeoffs as “Foundation vs. Emotion vs. Intelligence,” not “who yelled loudest this week.”

It protected foundational work

By explicitly tying Foundation to speed, experimentation, and conversion, it was harder to dismiss as “polish.”

It set the conditions for scaling

The hiring plan wasn’t “we need more designers.” It was:

  • what we can realistically deliver at each stage

  • what investment unlocks next

  • when specialization actually makes sense

It turned design into a conversion engine

Because we protected Foundation work and sequenced brand + guidance, we moved subscription conversion from 2.5% to 25% over time.

It created shared language for prioritization

We could finally discuss tradeoffs as “Foundation vs. Emotion vs. Intelligence,” not “who yelled loudest this week.”

It protected foundational work

By explicitly tying Foundation to speed, experimentation, and conversion, it was harder to dismiss as “polish.”

It set the conditions for scaling

The hiring plan wasn’t “we need more designers.” It was:

  • what we can realistically deliver at each stage

  • what investment unlocks next

  • when specialization actually makes sense

It turned design into a conversion engine

Because we protected Foundation work and sequenced brand + guidance, we moved subscription conversion from 2.5% to 25% over time.

What I learned

  • Vision lands when it’s operational. The framework worked because it came with benefits, examples, and resourcing—not just principles.

  • Founders don’t hate unsexy work—they hate unclear work. Once Foundation was framed as the fastest path to growth (not a detour), it got real traction.

  • Sequencing is strategy. Saying “not yet” to Intelligence wasn’t resistance—it was building the runway to do it without making the product worse.

© 2026 Rachel Diesel

© 2026 Rachel Diesel

© 2026 Rachel Diesel

© 2026 Rachel Diesel